Standards: New (costly?), New (better?), and Needed(?)

ENR's Third Exit Stair Could Make Highrises Too Costly to Build (June 4, 2007) reports on the adoption of more stringent life safety requirements for tall buildings in the 2007 Supplement to the International Building Code. Both the Building Owners and Managers Association International and the American Institute of Architects oppose as too costly a new requirement for buildings taller than 420 feet to have at least 3 independent exit stairs. Other changes to tall building requirements in the 2007 Supplement, all coming in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center Buildings in New York City, include:

• protected fire service elevators and lobbies
• photoluminescent pathway markings in exit stairwells
• inspection and greater strength requirements for spray-applied fireproofing.

Proposals for progressive collapse resistance, increased  exit stairway enclosure integrity, and requirements for a a building's ability to burn without collapse were rejected. See the ICC's Code Development page for more information about that organization's code development process and the adoption of these new requirements.

In the same issue, Energy-Efficiency Guidelines Would Be National Model reports on the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineer's (ASHRAE) ongoing development of Standard 89, an enhanced building energy efficiency guideline. Standard 89, now open for comments, is intended to reduce building energy consumption by 30% in comparison to ASHRAE's long-recognized Standard 90, and is being touted as a national standard for achieving LEED certified optimized energy performance. See ASHRAE's Advanced Energy Design Guides page for more about this organization's enhanced energy performance guidelines.

Lastly, Innovative Mix with Fly Ash is Still Not Widely Used describes a concrete mix composed of lime, portland cement, and fly ash developed by Nai C. Yang of the New Port Authority 38 years ago for use in airport runway construction. The mix is claimed to provide superior concrete and a reduction in environmental impact (due to reduction in cement content and, consequently, reductions in C02 emissions). However its broader use in airport construction has been hampered by unfamiliarity and a lack of standards for its production.